Zeichner v. Mamaroneck Union Free School District
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*340OPINION OF THE COURT
Mary H. Smith, J.
It is ordered that this motion by respondent Mamaroneck Union Free School District for summary judgment dismissing this proceeding is hereby disposed of as follows:
Initially, the court notes that an attorney who is a party to a proceeding does not enjoy the privilege of using an affirmation. (See CPLR 2106; Seven Acre Wood St. Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 302 AD2d 511 [2d Dept 2003]; see also Slavenburg Corp. v Opus Apparel, 53 NY2d 799, 801 n [1981]; Matter of Flaton v Caso, 86 Misc 2d 695, 698 [Sup Ct, Nassau County 1976].) Pro se petitioner’s opposition is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Weiss v. WeissNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hope v. CortinesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Hope v. CortinesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Slavenburg Corp. v. Opus Apparel, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Fuentes v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.