Legal Opinion
Hope v. Cortines
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 8, 1995No. 274PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
69 F.3d 687
104 Ed. Law Rep. 595, 4 A.D. Cases 1856,
7 NDLR P 296
Lloyd HOPE and Constance Fennell, individually and as
parents and lawful guardians of Moyo Hope, a
minor; and Moyo Hope, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Ramon CORTINES, individually and as Chancellor of the Board
of Education of the City of New York; and the
Board of Education of the City of New
York, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 274, Docket 95-7151.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Oct. 13, 1995.
Decided Nov. 8, 1995.
Loren Baily, Brooklyn, N.Y., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Jane L. Gordon, New York City (Paul A. Crotty, Corporation…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hope v. CortinesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Hope v. CortinesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
3Cited by29 opinions
- Pearl Murphy and Theodore Murphy v. Arlington Central School District Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Polera v. Board of Education of the Newburgh Enlarged City School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- N.K. ex rel. J.K. v. New York City Deptartment of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- " BD" v. DeBuonoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Babicz Ex Rel. Babicz v. School Board of Broward CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.