Legal Opinion

State v. Mora

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 2000No. 990377PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*479VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Juan Raul Mora appeals from a criminal judgment of conviction upon a plea of guilty to delivery of a controlled substance. We affirm, concluding the district court properly entered sentence.

[¶ 2] Mora was charged with delivering cocaine, a schedule II controlled substance, to an undercover police officer on September 16, 1998. Mora had two prior convictions in Minnesota for delivery of methamphetamine, which is also a schedule II controlled substance.

[II3] Section 19-03.1-23, N.D.C.C., prohibits the delivery of a controlled substance and provides:

1.... Any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GahnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. BloomdaleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. State v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. GielenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. CookNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Eaton v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Gajewski v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. CharbonneauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API