Fidelity Bank v. Duden
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentDel Sole, Judge
I respectfully dissent because I believe this Court is without jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeals presently before us, and accordingly, the appeals should be quashed.
Presented before this Court are consolidated appeals from two Orders entered by the trial court. The appeal at No. 2878 is from an order entered September 19, 1984, *131which struck Appellant’s “counterclaim”. The appeal at No. 3321 is from an order entered December 4, 1984, as amended April 10, 1985, which dismissed Appellant’s petition to amend her answer nunc pro tunc.
On March 25, 1982, Fidelity Bank (hereafter,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.