Legal Opinion

McKissick v. Frye

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 3, 1994No. 68,460PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.;

Plaintiff filed an action for injuries suffered in an automobile collision. The jury apportioned the fault at 20% to plaintiff and 80% to defendant and awarded $125,388.12 after adjustment for comparative fault. Defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals. In an unpublished opinion it affirmed the trial court, except the award to plaintiff of $30,000 for future medical expenses. The Court of Appeals found that there was not sufficient evidence to support the jury’s award for future medical ex penses. This court granted plaintiff’s petition…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Bair v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Farley v. EngelkenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Tetuan v. A.H. Robins Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Miller v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. State v. OrrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  4. State v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Varney Business Services, Inc. v. PottroffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API