Smith v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSwaim, J.
The appellant, Ernest Smith, was prosecuted on an affidavit charging him with having sold intoxicating liquor, on or about the - day of March, 1941, to Noel Wright and Errol Purlee without being the holder of an alcoholic beverage permit, contrary to the provisions of § 12-605, Burns’ 1933 (Supp.), § 3764-31(5), Baldwin’s Supp. 1937. A trial to a jury resulted in his conviction and this appeal is from the judgment entered thereon.
Under the alleged error of the court in overruling his motion for a new trial the appellant has attempted to raise various questions. One question so raised by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Higham v. VanosdolIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Heath v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Deming Hotel Co. v. SissonIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
- Indianapolis & Martinsville Rapid Transit Co. v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Ruddy v. George F. Blake Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blanton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Schlegel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Blanton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953