Legal Opinion

United States v. Lloyd Joyner

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 14, 2018No. 17-10289; 17-10826PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

After a six-day trial, a jury found Lloyd Joyner and Dave Sturgis, Jr. guilty of multiple counts of Hobbs Act robbery and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951 (a) and 924(c)(1)(a)(ii), respectively. In these consolidated appeals, Joyner and Sturgis raise many issues, but having reviewed the briefs and the record, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find only one to have merit. Accordingly, we vacate Joyner's sentence and remand his case for resentencing; we affirm in all other respects.

I. BACKGROUND

Joyner and Sturgis, along with another…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Charlie L. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Tanganica CorbettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Jay GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Nicodemo ScarfoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  5. State v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 2019

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API