Legal Opinion

United States v. Tanganica Corbett

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 17, 2019No. 18-13203PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge:

*1035 This appeal requires us to review two sentencing enhancements for plain error and to reverse one of them. After Tanganica Corbett pleaded guilty to participation in an identity-fraud conspiracy, the district court enhanced her offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines two levels for an offense involving ten or more victims and ten levels for an offense that caused a loss that exceeds $150,000 but does not exceed $250,000. See United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2B1.1(b)(1)(F), (b)(2)(A)(i) (Nov. 2016). Corbett objected to each enhancement in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Molina-Martinez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. David Sapuppo, Theresa Sapuppo v. Allstate Floridian Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Rosales-Mireles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Roberto Trinidad Del Carpio FrescasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Andre Michael DuboisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
  3. Regions Bank v. Legal Outsource PACourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Isaac FeldmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Jesus RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API