Legal Opinion

First of America Bank v. Thompson

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 1996No. Docket 172576PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P.J.

The instant deficiency action was brought by plaintiff, the assignee bank under a motor vehicle retail installment sales contract, against defendant, a co-buyer for the purchaser, following repossession and sale of the vehicle. The question is whether the applicable limitation period is four years as set forth in § 2-725 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), MCL 440.2725(1); MSA 19.2725(1), or she years as generally applicable to contract claims, MCL 600.5807(8); MSA 27A.5807(8). We conclude that a deficiency action, although arising from both a sale of goods and a secured transaction,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burton v. Artery CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Associates Discount Corporation v. PalmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  3. Chaney v. Fields Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Worrel v. Farmers Bank of State of Del.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  5. Fries v. Holland Hitch CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Professional Rehabilitation Associates v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Coventry Parkhomes Condominium Ass'n v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. DaimlerChrysler Services North America, LLC v. OuimetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  5. Noll v. RitzerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API