Legal Opinion
In re Jared
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Surrogate’s Court. We add only that the issue of respondent’s standing (see, Domestic Relations Law § 111 [1] [a]) may not be raised for the first time on appeal because it "could have been obviated or cured by factual showings or legal countersteps” in the trial court (Telaro v Telaro, 25 NY2d 433, 439, rearg denied 26 NY2d 751; see, Oram v Capone, 206 AD2d 839, 840; cf., Matter of Baby Girl, 206 AD2d 932, 933). Were we to reach the issue in the exercise of our discretion, we would nevertheless affirm. The record establishes that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Telaro v. TelaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Oram v. CaponeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re Peter H. T.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re Mark A. F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dessauer v. DessauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Dessauer v. DessauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- GREENLEE, ANTONIA v. DESSAUER, THOMASAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re the Estate of LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Estate of LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014