Legal Opinion
In re Peter H. T.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 1985PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1091OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to Family Court, Dutchess County, for further consideration in accordance with this memorandum.
Respondent, Mark T., is the natural father of the proposed adoptive child, Andrew, who was born out of wedlock on September 11,1977. Mark never married the child’s mother, Catherine H., but they lived together for several years prior to their separation in 1979. Catherine and her husband, Timothy De V., whom she married in 1982, wish to adopt Andrew. They seek to do so…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Corey L v. Martin LNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- In re the Adoption of Amy SSNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- In re the Adoption of Amy SS. Robert TT.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by44 opinions
- In re Dakiem M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Taylor R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- John Q. v. Erica R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Dominique P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re Denise H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.