Legal Opinion

Duke v. Neisler & Newsom

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1910PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Affidavit of illegality. Before Judge Felton. Crawford superior court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

Neisler & Newsom foreclosed a chattel mortgage against Mittie A. Duke and E. C. Duke. The property specified in the mortgage as that upon which a lien was created is described as follows: “our crop planted this year, and on which said fertilizer is used.” The mortgage fi. fa. was duly issued and levied on the following property: “Two hundred bushels of cottonseed, more or less, in the house, also 1400 lbs. seed-cotton in house; also fifteen bushels of corn in house, more or less, two bales of seed-cotton in field, more or less.” E. C. Duke and his wife, Mittie A. Duke, filed separate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crine v. Tifts & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  2. Patterson v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Broach v. O'NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bennett v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Livestock Credit Corp. v. CorbettIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Reynolds v. Tifton Guano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Commodity Credit Corp. v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Stewart v. ClemensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API