Legal Opinion

Hilco Electric Cooperative v. Midlothian Butane Gas Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2003No. 01-0336PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jefferson

in which Chief Justice PHILLIPS, Justice ENOCH, Justice OWEN, Justice O’NEILL, Justice SCHNEIDER, Justice SMITH, and Justice WAINWRIGHT joined.

The primary issue in this case is whether the Electric Cooperative Corporation Act (“ECCA”), particularly as amended in 1997 by House Bill 3203, Act of May 24, 1997, 75th Leg., R.S., ch. 904, § 4, 1997 Tex. Gen. Laws 2847, 2849-50 (“H.B. 3203”), allows a nonprofit electric cooperative to create and own a for-profit subsidiary propane business. See Tex. Util.Code § 161.001-.254. The district court granted summary judgment declaring that HILCO Electric…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Carr v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State Ex Rel. Southwestern Gas & Electric Co. v. Upshur Rural Electric Co-Operative Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Midlothian Butane Gas Co. v. Hilco Electric Cooperative, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission v. Texas Citizens for a Safe Future & Clean WaterTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Marks v. St. Luke's Episcopal HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  3. SSP Partners v. Gladstrong Investments (USA) Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Lezlea Ross v. St. Luke's Episcopal HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Timothy Castleman & Castleman Consulting, LLC v. Internet Money Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2018

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API