Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Omnisec International Security Services, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 20, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2013-0402PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Phyllis Montgomery, proceeding pro se, has filed suit against her former employer, Omnisec International Security Services, Inc. (“Omnisec”), alleging discrimination based on age, race, and gender, as well as retaliation based on her involvement in union activities. Currently before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint. (Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, Apr. 4, 2013 [ECF No. 8] (“Mot.”).) For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff is an…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ross v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Hill v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Edwards v. GrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Washington v. Alliedbarton Sec. Servs., LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Washington v. District of Columbia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API