Legal Opinion

Navracel v. Cudahy Packing Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1922No. 22198PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlansburg, J.

This was an action by the plaintiff, an employee of the defendant Cudahy Packing Company, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of the alleged negligence of the defendant company in failing to guard certain machinery housed in its plant. It is not questioned but that the accident arose out of and in the course of the plaintiff’s employment. The defense was that the plaintiff, as an employee who had not formally rejected the compensation law, came within its provisions, and that its remedies were exclusive as against any suit for damages against the employer, based…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Adams v. Iten Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Shade v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Menter Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Sciola's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Abbott v. Gould, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Johnson v. United States. The Patrol Boat No. Q- 14Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  4. Melvin Smith and Mona Smith v. Gould, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. Echord v. RushSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API