Legal Opinion

Hotel Esplanade, Inc. v. Herman

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The petitioner landlord brings this proceeding, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review certain orders of the Acting State Bent Administrator, and to declare those orders null and void. The effect of these orders was to deny the petitioner’s application for relief pursuant to subdivision 7 of section 33 of the State Bent and Eviction Begulations. That section provides in substance that an increase in maximum rent may be applied for by the landlord who operates a notel and who has incurred unavoidable increases in certain operating costs since “ the date the landlord…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Matter of Mounting Finishing Co. v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Matter of Park East Land Corp. v. FinkelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Sasmor v. V. Vivaudou, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1951
  5. 609 Holding Corp. v. McGoldrickNew York Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lycee Francais v. CalagnaNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hotel Esplanade, Inc. v. HermanNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hotel Associates, Inc. v. Howard Johnson Franchise Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API