Legal Opinion

Hotel Esplanade, Inc. v. Herman

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

An intermediate order entered in a proceeding instituted in pursuance of article 78 of the Civil Practice Act is not appeal-able without le-ave of the court which made the order (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1304; Matter of Sunland Beverage Corp. v. Rohan, 6 A D 2d 996; 22 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, pp. 556-557).

In the instant matter, a determination was made by the State Bent Administrator denying the petitioner’s applications for a rent increase. At no time was there a hearing thereon on the merits before the Bent Commission. Upon the article 78 proceeding brought by the petitioner to review the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hotel Esplanade, Inc. v. HermanNew York Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vivenzio v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API