Legal Opinion
City of Amsterdam v. Daniel Goldreyer, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 13, 1995No. 93 CV 5012 (SJ)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
JOHNSON, District Judge:
INTRODUCTION
The City of Amsterdam brought suit against Daniel Goldreyer Ltd. and Daniel Goldreyer (“Defendants”) to recover damages for breach of contract. Defendants now seek dismissal of the Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted. Defendants also move to strike the punitive damages claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). In the alternative, Defendants request a stay of the proceedings pending the outcome of a state court…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Ground Zero Museum Workshop v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- ABF Capital Management v. Askin Capital Management, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
- eBay, Inc. v. Bidder's Edge, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.