Legal Opinion

Monongahela & W. Dredging Co. v. Jones & Laughlins Steel Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1906No. 25PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Raw. On motion for new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, District Judge.

In this case a new trial is urged on the ground that binding instructions should have been given for the defendant. After .careful consideration we are firmly of opinion the court was justified in refusing to take the case from the jury. The suit was brought by a dredging company to recover for removing slag from the bank and dredging it from the bed of the Monongahela river. This slag had been run there by the defendant company. Part of it served to form a solid bank and part ran into the stream. On the bank thus formed the defendant had built coke ovens. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Donner v. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. LundstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  2. United States v. LundstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API