Legal Opinion

United States v. Lundstrom

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 20, 1943No. 10322Published

1Opinion of the Court

139 F.2d 792 (1943)

UNITED STATES

v.

LUNDSTROM et al. LUNDSTROM et al.

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 10322.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

December 20, 1943.

Carl C. Donaugh, U. S. Atty., and William H. Hedlund, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Portland, Ore., for appellant the United States.

Cheney & Hutcheson, Joseph C. Cheney, Elwood Hutcheson, and John Gavin, all of Yakima, Wash., and Bischoff & Bischoff and S. J. Bischoff, all of Portland, Ore. for appellant Lundstrom et al.

Before GARRECHT, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

For the period herein concerned John G. and W. B.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. United States v. Utah, Nevada & California Stage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. William & James Brown & Co. v. McGranSupreme Court of the United States · 1840

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API