Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Lundstrom

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 20, 1943No. 10322Published

1DissentGarrecht, Circuit Judge

Herein are set forth only those facts that relate to the jurisdictional question of whether or not the dispute in this case concerns a question of fact arising under the contract.

This is an action under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(20), against the United States to recover $7,199.99 for truck hauling services performed by the plaintiff. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $4,000. The defendant has appealed and the plaintiff has cross-ap^ pealed.

The plaintiff was a partnership engaged in the business of hauling by truck for hire. The manager of the business was the senior…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. William & James Brown & Co. v. McGranSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  3. Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Merrill-Ruckgaber Company v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Richardson v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1857

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API