O'NEIL v. Buchanan
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Plaintiff-appellees brought suit against defendant-appellants, claiming that appellants had constructed a driveway and fence on appellees’ land. Appellees sought damages and an injunction against further trespass. Appellants argued that the complained-of fence and driveway were in fact on their own property.
The parties are owners of contiguous parcels of land in the Town of Hartford. Appellants’ northern boundary coincides with appellees’ southern boundary. The outcome of this case depends on the location of the parties’ common boundary. Appellants locate the boundary — by reference to their…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Amey v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- Neill v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Houghton v. LeinwohlSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Clark v. TaborSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
- Means v. OsborneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
3Cited by9 opinions
- Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. LysobeySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Hoague v. CotaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Lakeview Farm, Inc. v. EnmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Chelsea Ltd. Partnership v. Town of ChelseaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Heath v. DudleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.