Patterson v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Barber Asphalt Paving Company from an order of the district court for Blue Earth county, Eorin Cray, J., overruling a. general demurrer to the reply to defendant’s separate answer to the amended and supplemental complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The facts in this case are as follows: The action was commenced in 1902 against the Barber Asphalt Paving Company, as sole defendant. The original complaint alleged that plaintiffs were residents and tax*40payers of the city of Mankato, and owners of property abutting on Broad street, between Warren and Lincoln 'streets; that in 1898 said street was, by the authority of the city, curbed, graded, and boulevarded at the expense of owners of abutting property; that, under a contract made and entered into with the city of Manicato subsequent to such improvements, defendant threatened and intended to…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- City of St. Paul v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Mankato v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Smyth v. ButtersUtah Supreme Court · 1910
- Oliver v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1919
- Platte Valley Irrigation District v. TilleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Patterson v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.