Legal Opinion

Oliver v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal : Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the CourtShohl, P. J.

On March 14, 1917, the council of the city of Cincinnati passed ordinance No. 96-1917, pertaining to the street railway franchise and the operation of the rapid transit loop authorized by said ordinance to be constructed by the Board of Rapid Transit Commissioners. It provided that a special election should be held on Tuesday, April 17, 1917, of which due notice was to be given as required by law. The project, submitted to the voters at said election, prevailed. On the day after the passage of the ordinance, the plaintiff, a taxpayer of the city of Cincinnati, requested the city solicitor, in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Peck v. . GoodberlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Roberts v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1891
  3. Pond v. . HarwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Sherman v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Reynolds v. . EverettNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mallon v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Hughes v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API