Legal Opinion

Trant v. Lucent Technologies

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 4, 2006No. 2005-18-M.PPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice GOLDBERG, for the Court.

In this dispute between an employer and former employee, the Court is confronted with a single issue: Must an employee be totally incapacitated for more than fifty-two consecutive weeks to qualify for a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) provided by G.L.1956 § 28 — 33—17(f)(1), as amended by P.L. 2000, ch. 491, § 4? 1 Although the petitioner-plaintiff, John Trant (Trant), was totally incapacitated for more than fifty-two weeks as of May 10, 2002, 2 the period of incapacity was not consecutive, having been interrupted by a term of partial incapacity. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brennan v. KirbySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  2. Cummings v. ShoreySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  3. Oliveira v. LombardiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  4. Jeff Anthony Properties v. Zoning Board of Review of the Town of North ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  5. Rison v. Air Filter Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Patrizia Prew v. Employee Retirement System of the City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  2. Vellucci v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2013
  3. Ashley v. DonohueSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  4. John R. Grasso v. Gina RaimondoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018
  5. John R. Grasso v. Gina RaimondoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API