John R. Grasso v. Gina Raimondo
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Dissent
'Justice Flaherty,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent from the holding of the majority. I do so because G.L. 1956 § 45-21.2-10, clearly and unambiguously, states that “[t]he amount of retirement allowance for accidental disability is that as prescribed in § 45-21-22.” The question we have been asked to decide is whether the language of that statute subjects the plaintiff to the additional requirements that are set forth in G.L. 1956 §§ 45-21-23 and 45-21-24. It is readily apparent from the above-quoted language that § 45-21.2-10 is silent on that question. However, that silence does not in and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dodd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- New York Trust Co. v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Servs. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- In Re Review of Proposed Town of New Shoreham ProjectSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.