Legal Opinion
Baird v. Mall
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 2, 1930No. File Nos. 6575, 6576, 6577PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHERWOOD; J.
This appeal includes three separate actions, each brought by the receiver appointed1 by a North Dakota court for an insolvent North Dakota state bank. The actions were brought in the circuit court of Beadle county, S. D., against the three South Dakota stockholders of said -bank, to recover from each his double liability as a stockholder. The complaints are identical except as to names and amounts. By stipulation the three actions were tried together in the circuit court. At the close of the trial a verdict was directed against each of the defendants separately. From a judgment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Howarth v. . AngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Lowry v. . InmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Stoddard v. . LumNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Fish, Receiver v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Argo Oil Corporation v. LathropSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Baird v. BarnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931