Legal Opinion

A. Klipstein & Co. v. Allen

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided May 29, 1903No. 1,725PublishedCited by 10 opinions

At Law. On demurrers to both petition and answer.

1Opinion of the Court

PARDEE, Circuit Judge.

After due investigation, I have concluded to overrule both demurrers—the demurrer to the petition on authority of section 3664 of the Civil Code of Georgia, and the demurrer to the answer on the grounds elaborated by Judge Sanborn in Cold Blast Transportation Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co., 114 Fed. 77, 81, 52 C. C. A. 25, 57 L. R. A. 696, on which counsel on both sides of the case rely.

It is to be noted that the amended answer contains the averment “that solid quebracho was a necessary product for defendant’s factory, and the factory could not be run without its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cold Blast Transp. Co. v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marin Water & Power Co. v. Town of SausalitoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Fuchs v. United Motor Stage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Griffin v. Oklahoma Natural Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  4. Rehm-Zeiher Co. v. F. G. Walker Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. T. B. Walker Mfg. Co. v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API