Legal Opinion

State v. Fahringer

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 15, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4727PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

The state has brought this special action to challenge the respondent court’s granting of a defense motion to continue an evidentiary hearing on a probation revocation until after the trial on the new charges. Since we believe the trial court abused its discretion and because petitioner is without an adequate remedy by means of an appeal, we assume jurisdiction and grant relief.

The real party in interest was placed on probation on September 25,1981, for a period of three years on a plea of guilty to the crime of criminal trespass in the first degree. On January 24,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JamesonArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Thomas v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Paley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Hernandez v. County of YumaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Exporters of Manufacturers' Products v. Butterworth-Judson Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Department of Water ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. State v. FlemmingArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Backus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Resolution Trust Corp. v. SegelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Frost v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API