Legal Opinion
Exporters of Manufacturers' Products v. Butterworth-Judson Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 12, 1920PublishedCited by 2 opinions
At Law. Action by the Exporters of Manufacturers’ Products against the Butterworth-Judson Corporation. On motion oE plaintiff to extend term for purpose of settling and filing bill of exceptions.
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, District Judge.
[1] By an order of this court dated March 2, 1920, it was—
“Ordered that the November term of this court, for the purpose of settling and filing the bill of exceptions herein, he and the same hereby is extended up to and including April 6, 1920.”
The present motion is to extend the November term to May 3, 1920. The action is at law, and the judgment was filed November 26, 1919. Under rule S of this court, the term expired on February 24, 1920. On March 1, 1920, the attorneys for the parties stipulated as follows :
“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Oxford & Coast Line R. v. Union Bank of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1907
- Blisse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Western Dredging & Improvement Co. v. HeldmaierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brummitt Tire Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
- State v. FahringerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983