Prescott v. Beyer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from a judgment of tbe district court for Ramsey county, Simons, J., presiding, restraining and enjoining tbe defendants from entering upon a certain strip of land adjudged to belong to the plaintiffs, and claimed by defendants to lie witbin tbe limits of a public highway.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
Action for an injunction to restrain defendants from entering upon a strip of land in that part of tbe city of St. Paul formerly West St. Paul. Tbe defendants claim that tbe strip is a street, and that they were entering upon it by authority of tbe city for tbe purpose of improving tbe street. By Sp. Laws 1861, c. 16, tbe legislature provided for a state road four rods wide, from some point on tbe west bank of the Mississippi river opposite St. Paul, to be selected by tbe commissioners, to Owatonna, in Steele county. Tbe act appointed three commissioners to locate and lay it out, and they…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Parker v. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
- Tise v. . Whitaker-Harvey Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Marchand v. Town of Maple GroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Tise v. Whitaker-Harvey Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Crawford v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.