Legal Opinion

Marchand v. Town of Maple Grove

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1892PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by defendant, the township of Maple Grove, from a judgment of the district court of Hennepin county, Canty, J., entered August 28, 1891, in favor of plaintiff, David Marchand, for $127.08' damages and costs. Plaintiff owned the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter, and the northeast quarter of the northwest'quarter, of section fourteen, (14,) in township one hundred and nineteen (119) north, of range twenty-two (22) west.

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendant, the township of Maple Grove, from a judgment of the district court of Hennepin county, Canty, J., entered August 28, 1891, in favor of plaintiff, David Marchand, for $127.08' damages and costs. Plaintiff owned the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter, and the northeast quarter of the northwest'quarter, of section fourteen, (14,) in township one hundred and nineteen (119) north, of range twenty-two (22) west. In the year 1858 the supervisors of the township laid out and established a highway upon his north line four rods wide, one half of it being on plaintiff’s…

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Action to recover damages for an alleged trespass on land belonging to plaintiff. Defendant town claimed, in justification, that at the place where its officers had excavated, and also raised an embankment, there had existed a public highway for more than twenty (20) years, and that the acts of its officers were performed within the limits of this highway, that it might be improved for public use. The facts were that in 1858 the proper authorities laid out ' and established, east and west, upon the section line which constistutes plaintiff’s north boundary line, a public highway four (4) rods…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pillsbury v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1890
  2. Bartlett v. BeardmoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Ehret v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Wayne County Savings Bank v. StockwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Scheimer v. PriceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Game, Forestation & Parks Commission v. HullNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Bayard v. Standard Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Illinois Steel Co. v. JekaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Arndt v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Hurley v. City of West St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API