Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Ferguson
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentLocher, J.
The majority properly notes that a writ of prohibition is an extraordinary writ and should issue only in cases of extreme necessity arising from the inadequacy of other remedies.
In the instant cause, a declaratory judgment action or an injunction, or both, are available adequate remedies, which should deny the issuance of a writ.
This court has firmly established that it will refuse to issue the high prerogative writ of prohibition in any instance where there exists a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Dormody, v. McClure (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 335;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Crebs v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- State ex rel. City of Dayton v. KernsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Lindley v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Dormody v. McClureOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Transairco, Inc. v. Common Pleas CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.