Legal Opinion

Transairco, Inc. v. Common Pleas Court

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1976No. 75-520PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Relators complain about “the continued prejudiced mode of proceeding in the Common Pleas Court.”

In the recent case of State, ex rel. Bell, v. Blair (1975), 43 Ohio St. 2d 95, 96, this court stated that the following conditions must exist to support the issuance of a writ of prohibition:

*28“1. The court or officer against -whom it is sought must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power ;
“2. The exercise of such power must be unauthorized by law; and
“3. It must appear that the refusal of the writ would result in injury for which there is no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Bell v. BlairOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smart v. McKinleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State, Ex Rel. Phillips v. PolcarOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API