Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dormody v. McClure

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1977No. Nos. 76-1237, 76-1275, 76-1366, 77-194 and 77-231PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Relators seek writs of prohibition to prevent respondent from trying them for the offenses of driving while under the influence of alcohol (R. C. 4511.19), alleging that respondent has no jurisdiction due to the fact that the Uniform Traffic Ticket sanctioned by Traf. R. 21 does not provide that the signature of the issuing officer be verified.

Prohibition is not the proper remedy where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Dickison, v. Court of Common Pleas (1971), 28 Ohio St. 2d 179. Respondent has jurisdiction of the persons and subject matter. Any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Dickison v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Henry v. BrittOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Smart v. McKinleyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Smith v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API