Legal Opinion
Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co. v. Carborundum Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 20, 1945No. Civil Actions Nos. 273, 252PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company et al., v. Carborundum Company, Civil Action No. 273, was consolidated for trial with Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company et al., v. Carborundum Company and E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Company, Civil Action No. 252.
I
In deciding Plaintiffs v. Carborundum, the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following § 723c, are
1. This suit was brought under R.S. § 4915 as amended, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, by plaintiff Byron J. Oakes and by plaintiff Minnesota Mining &…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- U. S. Industrial Chemicals, Inc. v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shamberg's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Lever Bros. Co. v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Carborundum Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Rock Island Motor Transit Co. v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Application of OakesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950