Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Haerlin

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 11, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The bill prays an injunction against the defendant for an alleged violation of a covenant contained in her deed, whichinter alia provides "that no stable or any outbuildings of any kind shall be erected on said lots." Complainants and defendant are adjoining property owners. Their respective lands are part of a tract comprising four hundred and twenty lots known as "East Orange Park," owned and developed by Philip J. Bowers Company. Deeds to various grantees of the common grantor contain restrictions pursuant to a general plan adopted for the development and improvement of the tract. All lots…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morrow v. HasselmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  2. Sanford v. KeerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  3. Polhemus v. De LisleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. Laverack v. AllenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  5. Bassett v. PepeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Van Name v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API