Legal Opinion

State v. Cerrillo

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 8, 2004No. 20386-7-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

Washington courts consider a person “seized” when an officer, by physical force or show of authority, restrains the person’s freedom of movement and a reasonable person would not believe he or she is free to leave. State v. O’Neill, 148 Wn.2d 564, 574, 62 P.3d 489 (2003). Officers knocked on the window of a parked pickup, woke up Gerardo Cerrillo and a passenger, and asked for Mr. Cerrillo’s identification. Mr. Cerrillo smelled of intoxicants. Later, one of the officers saw Mr. Cerrillo driving and stopped and arrested him for driving under the influence of alcohol. The trial court concluded…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jamison v. StormDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2006
  2. State v. CerrilloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. David Mistachkin v. Dylan Spencer et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
  4. State Of Washington v. Steven Lester KezaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API