Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Morrison

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1927No. 20764. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiffs, Mrs. Shaw and husband, commenced this action in the superior court for King county seeking a decree adjudicating a forfeiture of all rights of defendants, Mrs. Morrison and husband, under a contract whereby the plaintiffs agreed to sell, and the defendants agreed to purchase, a six-acre tract of land, including the abutting tide land, fronting on Magnolia Beach, in that county, for an agreed purchase price of ten thousand dollars, payable in installments extending over several years. The theory upon which the plaintiffs rest their claim for- relief is that the defendants have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hymes v. . EsteyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Wadham v. McVicarWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hoyt v. RotheWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Walquist v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Glad Tidings Church of America v. HinkleyArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Onekama Realty Co. v. CarothersArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Lasell v. BeckWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Ryker v. StidhamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Bulmon v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API