People v. Delouize
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
May the trial court in a criminal case reconsider an order granting the defendant’s motion for a new trial after the time for the prosecution to appeal the order has expired? Here, the Court of Appeal held that a trial court retains jurisdiction to reconsider an order granting a new trial, and to reinstate a jury’s verdicts. We agree, and thus we affirm the Court of Appeal’s judgment.
I
Because the circumstances of the offenses are not relevant to the issue raised on appeal, this statement of facts is limited to the procedural history of the case.
*1227The District Attorney of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. FalsettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. DeLouizeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004