Legal Opinion

People v. Delouize

California Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2004No. S108119PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

May the trial court in a criminal case reconsider an order granting the defendant’s motion for a new trial after the time for the prosecution to appeal the order has expired? Here, the Court of Appeal held that a trial court retains jurisdiction to reconsider an order granting a new trial, and to reinstate a jury’s verdicts. We agree, and thus we affirm the Court of Appeal’s judgment.

I

Because the circumstances of the offenses are not relevant to the issue raised on appeal, this statement of facts is limited to the procedural history of the case.

*1227The District Attorney of…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. FalsettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. DeLouizeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API