Legal Opinion
In Re McKinney Ranch Associates
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Decided June 19, 1986No. Bankruptcy 85-00239 SBPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER APPROVING EMPLOYMENT OF COUNSEL, AND DENYING APPOINTMENT NUNC PRO TUNC
SAMUEL L. BUFFORD, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This Chapter 11 bankruptcy case was filed by the debtor in possession McKinney Ranch Associates (“McKinney”), a California limited partnership, on January 4,1985. On the same day McKinney retained attorney Marc Zegar (“Applicant”) to represent it in this case, and paid him a retainer of $2,500. The debtor, however, has made no application to the Court until now to employ Applicant as counsel, even though such application is required by Bankruptcy Code § 327, 11 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In the Matter of Harry Fondiller, Debtor. Rosalyn Fondiller v. Jerome E. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
- Gas-A-Tron of Arizona and Coinoco v. Union Oil Company of California, Petrol Stops Northwest v. Continental Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re Hathaway Ranch PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1990
- In Re Plaza Hotel Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1990
- Andrew v. Coopersmith (In Re Downtown Investment Club III)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- In Re LeeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1989
- In Re Rusty Jones, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.