Legal Opinion

United States v. Geo. S. Bush & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 23, 1942No. 4344Published

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The merchandise involved in this appeal is invoiced as “single silk fishing line” and is referred to throughout the record as “artificial fishing gut” or “silk gut” and is made by coating silk threads or strands with a composition of formalin and gelatin. The merchandise was imported in 1928 in lengths of from 10 to 100 yards and in strengths of from K-pound test to 150-pound test. As imported it is not dyed. *243In this country most of it is dyed. Approximately 2 per centum of the same is sold undyed. After importation it is used either as fishing lines or as material for making fishing leaders,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. Rink v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. Didier-March Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API