Legal Opinion

United States v. Didier-March Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 11, 1912No. 751PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from. Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 26371 (T. D. 31832).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

The Didier-March Co. imported into the country at the port of New York certain machines which are utilized in chemical works to remove or expel therefrom the fumes of nitrous acid. The machines are called exhausters and are composed of stoneware and metal, stoneware being the component material of chief value. The appraiser returned the goods as manufactures of metal and earthenware, with earthenware as the constituent of chief value. Accordingly the collector of customs laid a duty on the exhausters of 55 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 96 of the tariff act of July 24,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seeberger v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  3. United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lunham & Reeve, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  2. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  4. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  5. United States v. Geo. S. Bush & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API