Legal Opinion

Camden Sewer Co. v. Mayor of Salisbury

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 13, 1932No. [No. 53, January Term, 1932.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

This is a suit for specific performance by the appellant against the appellee.

The bill of complaint was filed on the theory that the defendant had agreed to exercise the option, reserved in the franchise granted to the plaintiff’s predecessors, to take over at cost the sewer system constructed under said franchise.

The case comes up on appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the bill of complaint. The bill alleges that on or about' July Ith, 1902, tbe defendant passed an ordinance entitled, “An ordinance to permit sewer pipes to be laid on Camden Avenue and any of the streets or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Semmes v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  2. Brewer v. HerbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  3. Shepherd v. BevinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1850
  4. Brewer v. SowersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  5. Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. The Glendale Corp. v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Soehnlein v. PumphreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  3. Town of Berwyn Heights v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Kent County Planning Inspector v. AbelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Stinchcomb v. Realty Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API