Legal Opinion

Biwer v. Van Dorn

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1919PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, for.Ada County. Hon. Carl A. Davis, Judge. Action for damages. Order issued enjoining the selling of an automobile claimed to be exempt from execution. Appeal from order. Counsel cite no authorities on point decided.

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This is an action to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of the seizure and retention by appellants, under a writ of attachment, of an automobile owned by respondent, and to restrain appellants from selling or disposing of it or in any way interfering with respondent’s possession thereof.

Upon a motion made therefor, the court entered an order restraining appellants as prayed, until the final hearing of said cause upon the merits. This appeal is from the order granting the injunction.

*214The transcript on appeal does not contain a certificate either by the trial judge, clerk or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glenn v. Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Walsh v. NiessIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Glenn v. Aultman & Taylor Machinery Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Douglas v. KenneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Talbot v. CollinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Farm Credit Corp. v. MullinerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. McCarty v. WarnkinIdaho Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API