Legal Opinion

Kinney v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1920No. Civ. No. 3309PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granting a new trial. Chas. Wellborn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial in an action for damages resulting from an automobile collision. The plaintiffs upon the trial of the action before a jury were awarded a verdict in the sum of five thousand dollars damages. The defendant moved for a new trial upon several statutory grounds. The court granted said motion by an order which read as follows: “Defendant’s motion for a new trial is granted solely upon the ground that, conceding the evidence given by the plaintiffs to be true, plaintiffs were not as a matter of law entitled to recover.”

The plaintiffs have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. GoodwillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Whitelaw v. McGilliardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Bullis v. BallWashington Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gray v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Ramp v. OsborneOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Grillich v. WeinshenkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Saad v. LangworthyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Clark v. WallmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API