Legal Opinion
In re Minix
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 27, 2018No. 14–17–00417–CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartha Hill Jamison, Justice
In this original proceeding, we are asked to decide whether Section 153.0071 of the Texas Family Code permits the parties to a mediated settlement agreement in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship ("MSA") to agree to set aside the MSA. Here, there is evidence that the parties agreed to set aside the MSA. The trial court, however, never ruled that the MSA
*449was set aside. Subsequently, relator Gladys N. Minix moved to enter judgment on the MSA, and the trial court denied her motion.
Gladys brings this mandamus proceeding, asking this court to compel the Honorable David Farr, presiding…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
- Lopez v. Muñoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- In re H.E.B. Grocery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2016
- ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Angela Davis, as President of NEA-Dallas (A Local Affiliate of Texas State Teachers Association), on Behalf of All Affected Members and Named Individuals v. Mike Morath, Commissioner of Education of the State of Texas And Dallas Independent School District, a Public Body Corporate, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2019
- in the Interest of L.B., A.B., and D.B., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2019