Legal Opinion
Rice v. Heilbronner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 10, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In a prior appeal, we affirmed an order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the legal malpractice claims for all damages except those for fees for legal services (Rice v Heilbronner, 269 AD2d 828). Defendants now appeal from an order of Supreme Court granting plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve an amended complaint adding a cause of action for fraud against defendant Sanford J. Liebschutz, Esq. We affirm.
Contrary to defendants’ contention, plaintiffs set forth the circumstances constituting the alleged fraud in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lanzi v. BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- CPC International Inc. v. McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hutchins v. Utica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Pickard v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n & Women's Educational & Industrial Union of AuburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Rice v. HeilbronnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gelmac Quality Feeds, Inc. v. RonningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- M&T BANK CORPORATION v. MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015