Legal Opinion
Clement v. Peoples Drug Store, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 2, 1993No. 92-CV-201PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal by the plaintiff in this civil action, from a judgment entered after the grant of a defense motion for directed verdict, where the trial court found that appellant failed to establish a prima facie ease of negligence. Appellant asks this court to hold that an employer, here appellee Peoples Drug Store (“Peoples”), is liable for damages to the survivors of one of its employees, who was murdered by an unknown third person when the employee departed the premises after closing time, where some criminal activity had been reported in the vicinity of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Toy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Beard v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Lacy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Marshall v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- McKethean v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Novak v. Capital Management & Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- District of Columbia v. Beretta, U.S.A., Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Daka, Inc. v. BreinerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Briggs v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Haynesworth v. D.H. Stevens Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.