Lerner v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROVER, Chief Judge.
Appellants were convicted of possessing with the intent to sell lewd and obscene photographs, films, and literature in violation of Code 1951, § 22-2001. Evidence seized under a search warrant was admitted at trial and appellants’ principal contention here is that their motion to suppress, seasonably filed before trial and renewed during the trial, should have been granted on the ground that the warrant was issued without probable cause.
The showing of probable cause in this case rests chiefly on the affidavit of one Hipsley, a paid informer who had assisted the police on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Gatewood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Will Parks Clay and Mattie Bell Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. CefarattiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Theodor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Pueblo v. Luciano ArroyoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- Clio King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- State v. DavenportAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.